Little attention has been
afforded to the colonial legacies that remain in water rights, with colonial
era policies still plaguing and hindering Africa’s food production
efficiency. Water permit systems introduced across Africa by colonial
rulers in the early 20th century are unintentionally
criminalising millions of smallholders who cannot obtain permits (van
Koppen and Schreiner 2018). A recent report by the International
Water Management Institute (IWMI) has suggested that across five sub-Saharan
countries (Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe) over 100 million
people have not had access to sufficient water resources due to restrictive
permit systems (Reuters
2018). Approximately half of sub-Sahara African national governments
recognise customary water rights, however this is usually limited to
insubstantial farm irrigation and home use (Reuters
2018). With water rights tied to land rights in many parts Africa, you must
own land to be able to use water resources. However approximately 90% of rural
African land is undocumented and often held under customary law so to regulate
water rights, land rights are usually policed (Reuters
2018). Therefore, many small holders are often prosecuted and
unintentionally criminalised for using water without permits.
What are the problems caused by the permits?
These permit systems
remain active with their obligations expanding to all water users even
smallholders (FT 2018). The
license mandate is biased, benefitting large-scale water users such as
large irrigated farms, who can navigate the complicated and often expensive
application process (van
Koppen and Schreiner 2018). At
the other of the scale, the poorly funded state agencies in charge of licensing
have failed to reach millions of small farmers effectively rendering their
water use illegal and thus at risk of prosecution (resulting in fines/jail) (Reuters
2018). The IWMI study found that micro-scale farmers are exempt from
requiring a permit if they irrigate less than one acre of land, however they
have a weaker legal status than those holding a permit such that they cannot
safeguard their water uses and must compete with larger scale permit holders
for water resources (Reuters
2018). With informal customary regimes expanding across rural sub-Saharan
Africa and millions of small-scale users investing in water infrastructure for
self-supply and water sharing, it is apparent that farmer-led irrigation has
the potential to become the backbone of food production in sub-Saharan Africa
(see Blog 4) (van
Koppen and Schreiner 2018). As long as this exclusive legal framework
exists for water use, there will be little incentive for smallholders to invest
the irrigation structures used to offset vulnerability in rain-fed agriculture
in sub-Saharan Africa (FT 2018). This
would heavily undermine progress towards meeting food security and economic
growth development goals.
What possible solution is there?
With severely
lacking infrastructure incapable of informing and processing applications for
permits from all small-scale water users across sub-Saharan Africa, water law
should be ‘decolonised’ to give smallholders legal protection for their water
use (FT
2018). Permits are important to regulate those whose use poses a
significant impact on the environment and other stakeholders but need not apply
to small scale users who use relatively minuscule amounts. A hybrid approach of
regulation would be more effective for smallholder farmers and other
small-scale water users (FT 2018). This
system would recognise both existing water permits as well as customary rights
to water to an equal legal standing, to prevent criminalising small-scale users
and continue to encourage farmer-led irrigation investment. A hybrid
approach would reduce administrative requirements for water use regulation by
only targeting the existing permits at large-scale users and integrating this
with alternative rights-based management for smaller users (van
Koppen and Schreiner 2018). Permits could also be collectively
granted for groups of small farmers where appropriate to lower the cost for
farmers and administrative work for the state whilst affording legal protection
to small-scale users. The development of a more inclusive water regulation
system across sub-Saharan nations would allow smallholders to improve food
yields and thus income, contributing more to the wider domestic economy (FT 2018).
Comments
Post a Comment